Practical question of your legality of your Rev

Practical question of your legality of your Rev

1857.

third.-The fresh fourth anniversary out of Court “Crown and you will Anchor” Good.O.F. was popular because of the a food at Brother. Franklin’s, Hall Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood filled the fresh settee, and it also are stated that the new Courtroom next contained ninety professionals.

The month of january

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, Roentgen. Roentgen. B. Norman, Burton, and you will J. Bayly ended up being selected the members of the general public Collection Panel.

p. 207 One’s body regarding a good whale, that was drawn from the Winterton, was being exhibited toward Chapel Plain.

The newest Rev. W. D. Wade, the fresh new minister of St. Mary’s, Southtown, got, before you leave Southsea, been presented with a purse away from ?61.

21st.-The brand new “Sisters” is into the accident with one of the stone piers regarding brand new Bridge, that it got a lot more damaged.

Feb. next.-An enthusiastic Anti-Taxation fulfilling was kept on Area Hall. New Gran presided, and the pursuing the participated in what’s going on:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, Roentgen. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you can J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared to be the fresh new mover in this matter.

Feb. 21st.-Good “Poor’s Rates” appointment is held on Masonic Hall. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you can a resolution protesting contrary to the 1s. 6d. every quarter price is adopted. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Regal, R. Bailey, Nichols, and you can F. Starling spoke about them, since conduct of Guardians are defended from the Mr. J. H. Harrison, one of several Board.

Feb. 25th.-An instance hence happy significant interest, was heard at County Legal, Tolhouse-hallway, until the Judge (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The plaintiff is Mr. John Cobb, leather-based merchant, for exactly who Mr. C. H. Chamberlin looked; the fresh defendants were Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you can Grams. D. Palmer, have been represented by the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. Brand new plaintiff stated that he had been a candidate with the office of Councillor into e such from the solicitation out of Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you will G. D. Palmer. During the time the guy turned into an applicant the guy extremely told all of them he won’t spend out-of their own wallet so much more than simply ?10 towards expenditures of your own election, and it is knew the Liberal group, to which he belonged, carry out join others. The evening up until the election the guy received an estimate out of just what the expenses had been probably be, along with result of he immediately noticed one another Mr. Burroughs and you can Mr. G. D. Palmer. You to imagine, the guy thought, amounted so you can on ?forty five, as subscriptions completely amounted to help you however, ?42. After particular discussion they accessible to keep him harmless of one’s quantity of the expenses which may surpass the sum registered, and he and Mr. Burroughs upcoming ran p. 208 with the Committee-area of your own North-ward, where Mr. Burroughs told you that they had made preparations due to their friend John Cobb profitable the marketplace-ward. The expenses of the election, that he (new plaintiff) destroyed, amounted completely so you’re able to ?58 1s. 7d. The bill, for this reason, which he now reported on defendants is ?16 1s. 7d.-The latest plaintiff, inside the mix-test because of the Mr. Cufaude, accepted you to ?39 of your own entire amount try having – -.-Mr. Cufaude contended whenever, once the plaintiff stated, the latest defendants had considering your a promise to the extra costs, the fresh make sure ought to have composing. And you may, if in case evidence is real, and therefore, although not, the guy disputed, it actually was hopeless toward plaintiff to recoup, inasmuch when he themselves had desired one to a large part regarding the whole of the expenses try getting – -, that was an illegal work.-Mr. Chamberlin debated your plaintiff, shortly after choosing new vow in the defendants, acted just abreast of Bacolod city women personals the new faith of that promise, and this ergo, because they got joined upon an involvement to expend the money, these people were liable. The money, additionally, wasn’t spent by the plaintiff, however, from the panel appointed to carry out the election, and you may before the election try over, the latest plaintiff wasn’t conscious the money had already been spent inside – -.-His Honor told you it absolutely was obvious the make certain need come on paper. He was out-of advice, as well as, that the plaintiff wasn’t bound to spend the money for unlawful fees, and consequently he could not promote their action for the money which he stated.-The plaintiff is actually, consequently, non-cure.

Published
Categorized as free

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *