Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, A beneficial., & Rumiati, R. I. (2021). The brand new sum of identification and you will cleverness on the cognitive competences in the large training. Frontiers from inside the Psychology, 12, 2566.
Damian, R. I., Spengler, Meters., Sutu, A great., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). 16 taking place 60-six: A longitudinal examination of personality stability and alter across the half a century. Log off Identity and you can Public Psychology, 117(3), 674.
Daurio, An excellent. M., & Taylor, J. (2022). An investigation of your own triarchic make of psychopathy and you can mind-advertised People B identification ailment qualities. Identification Issues: Theory, Search, and you can Medication, 13(2), 153.
Furnham, An excellent., & Monsen, J. (2009). Characteristics and cleverness anticipate instructional university grades. Understanding and you may individual variations, 19(1), 28-33.
Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Forecasting educational and you will social–emotional effects from inside the growing adulthood regarding intelligence, identification, and you may socioeconomic standing. Record out of Identity and you will Public Mindset.
Holland, A. S., & Roisman, Grams. We. (2008). Huge Five personality traits and you can relationship top quality: Self-claimed, observational, and you may emotional evidence. Journal out-of Societal and personal Relationship, 25(5), 811-829.
Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, M. (2006). The connection anywhere between cleverness and you may splitting up. Log away from Family relations Points, 27(12), 1723-1748.
Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y. (2006). Symptomatology off Class-B Character Conditions about Four-Basis Design Perspective. Chinese Psychological state Log.
Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). College or university knowledge and you will low-intellectual skills advancement. Oxford Economic Papers, 70(2), 538-562.
Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). Brand new perception out-of parents’ and spouses’ education on the separation and divorce pricing in the Norway. Group search, ten, 121-142.
Mathes, Age. W., Brennan, S. Yards., Haugen, P. Yards., & Rice, H. B. (1985). Reviews regarding actual attractiveness as the a function of ages. This new Record from Personal Therapy, 125(2), 157-168.
Mate worth can get decline (or perhaps not), but it does perhaps not be seemingly a shield so you’re able to relationships creation
McGue, Yards., Anderson, E. L., Willoughby, Age., Giannelis, An effective., Iacono, W. G., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Perhaps not by grams by yourself: The key benefits of a degree one of people who have low levels regarding standard cognitive feature. Intelligence, ninety-five, 101642.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, Meters. D., Carter, Meters. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Is sociable individuals more beautiful? A zero-friend data away from agreeableness, extraversion, and you can attractiveness. Journal of Browse inside Character, 44(2), 293-296.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). The newest communications between college poverty and you can agreeableness during the anticipating instructional attainment. Character and you will Private Distinctions, 127, 85-88.
Standard faculties out-of identification and you will affectivity once the predictors regarding fulfillment within the close dating: Proof of notice?and you may partner?studies
Tatarunaite, Elizabeth., Playle, Roentgen., Bonnet, K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Facial elegance: a beneficial longitudinal study. Western Record out of Orthodontics and you may Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.
Sarah Flooding, Miriam Queen, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and you will Michael Westberry. Included Public Play with Microdata Show, Most recent People Survey: Version 10.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.
Scott, S. B., Rhoades, Grams. K., Stanley, S. Yards., Allen, E. S., & ). Aspects of separation and divorce and memory regarding premarital input: Effects to have improving relationships training. Partners and you may Family relations Mindset: Lookup and exercise, 2(2), 131.
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J Sri Lanka femmes personnelles. (2014). Exactly why do character traits anticipate splitting up? Multiple paths through satisfaction. Log from Character and you can Societal Therapy, 106(6), 978.
Vernon, P. An effective., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A great. (2008). A behavioural genetic research of one’s Ebony Triad as well as the Huge 5. Character and you can personal Variations, 44(2), 445-452.
Widiger, T. An excellent., Sellbom, M., Chmielewski, Meters., Clark, L. An excellent., DeYoung, C. Grams., Kotov, R., … & Wright, A. Grams. (2019). Identification in a good hierarchical model of psychopathology. Medical Emotional Technology, 7(1), 77-ninety five.
The current CPS research cannot show in the event your threat of breakup are ingredient. Interactions you will definitely indicate blended marriage ceremonies features highest or lower threats than the sum of the risks of a couple individuals. not, earlier lookup with the separation and you will degree shows that it’s (Lyngstad, 2004). The new divorce exposure for two PhD owners is about fifteen%, consistent with the individual threat of seven-8% to own private PhD proprietors.
Buss, D. Yards., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The fresh mate modifying theory. Character and you may Private Differences, 104, 143-149.