The fresh questionnaire contains step 3 pieces. Part We integrated concerns off socio-market study (years, number of training, parity, familial earnings, community, newest marital condition, sexual pastime, reputation of HPV inoculation, and you may reputation for abnormal cervical cancer tumors evaluating).
Area II made up of 6 questions relating to the prospective women who might be screened, many years first off, regularity, age otherwise criteria to eliminate off screening, and techniques regarding screening. Just the professionals who’d heard out-of HPV carry out just do it to Region III and therefore reviewed information about HPV regarding the method of (oncogenic or non-oncogenic), form out-of alert and you can prevention.
Before the research, the brand new questionnaire off region II and you can region III inside the Thai adaptation was in fact considered, chatted about, and you may revised until opinion among 20 researchers who had been every gynecologic oncologists (specific was basically experts in other synchronous education). The experts rated each one of 19 questions just like the either ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘not relevant’. The thing-peak Content Legitimacy List (I-CVI) is actually calculated per product, and also the Articles Validity List (CVI) is actually determined by firmly taking the typical ratio away from 14 questions regarding understanding of cervical malignant tumors screening and you may 5 questions relating to HPV. This new CVI was in fact step one for both components of the fresh new survey (S1 Desk). The fresh precision try examined within the 29 women with the same trait because members. The new Cronbach’ leader coefficients to the accuracy was indeed 0.819 having understanding of cervical disease screening and 0.907 to have information about HPV.
Research range
Into the time from arranged colposcopy, the analysis secretary considering guidance of research towards the female who met introduction criteria. The women who offered to participate offered written informed concur and you may responded the newest survey individually by themselves before continuing to help you colposcopy.
Studies compiled because of it studies were socio-group investigation (Region We of questionnaire), experience in cervical disease evaluating (Part II), and you can experience in HPV (Part III).
Statistical studies
The fresh solutions of knowledge on the cervical malignant tumors examination and you can HPV had been analyzed of the for each and every items just before rating categorization. Right respond to are scored because the step 1 while ‘incorrect and you may not knowing answer’ try obtained 0.
Out of fourteen inquiries regarding cervical cancer evaluation, female whoever score was in fact ? ten was indeed randomly classified due to the fact that have ‘a beneficial knowledge’ if not was considered as with “not-good knowledge”. To have experience with HPV, women whose address was ‘never ever heard yderligere lГ¦sning of HPV’ had been omitted on the research of HPV training.
From 5 inquiries, feminine whoever get was basically ? step three had been thought to be that have ‘a good expertise in HPV’ usually as ‘not-good knowledge’. Out-of 19 concerns, women whose score was in fact ? 13 were categorized because the having ‘an excellent full knowledge’ or else because ‘not good complete knowledge’.
All the data was basically built-up from inside the an electronic databases and you can analyzed using SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive analytics were used to research demographic investigation and you can were described since the numbers having payment, mean with important departure otherwise average which have diversity. The brand new connection ranging from each variable and you can studies get were analyzed using easy linear regression. Exploratory design was created into the multivariable studies and all of the parameters potentially about the data get. The fresh new considered amount of analytical advantages is an effective p-value of 0.05 or less.
Results
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>